[147338] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] TLS2
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen Farrell)
Mon Sep 30 10:05:26 2013
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <5247DBFE.4000202@iang.org>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:13:29 +0100
To: ianG <iang@iang.org>
Cc: "cryptography@metzdowd.com" <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
> On 29 Sep 2013, at 08:51, ianG <iang@iang.org> wrote:
>
>> On 28/09/13 20:07 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>
>> b) is TLS1.3 (hopefully) and maybe some extensions for earlier
>> versions of TLS as well
>
>
> SSL/TLS is a history of fiddling around at the edges. If there is to be any hope, start again. Remember, we know so much more now. Call it TLS2 if you want.
>
> Start with a completely radical set of requirements. Then make it so. There are a dozen people here who could do it.
>
> Why not do the requirements, then ask for competing proposals? Choose 1. It worked for NIST, and committees didn't work for anyone.
>
> A competition for TLS2 would bring out the best and leave the bureaurats fuming and powerless.
>
Sounds like a suggestion to make on the tls wg list. It might get some support, though I'd guess not everyone would want to do that
S
S
>
> iang
> _______________________________________________
> The cryptography mailing list
> cryptography@metzdowd.com
> http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
