[147380] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] TLS2
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (ianG)
Tue Oct 1 10:40:27 2013
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 10:54:59 +0300
From: ianG <iang@iang.org>
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <CAHOTMVL-mYDAccsxRxGw1M7C771ApuLU2GgJM1svi1DXBtbM=g@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
On 1/10/13 02:01 AM, Tony Arcieri wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 1:02 AM, Adam Back <adam@cypherspace.org
> <mailto:adam@cypherspace.org>> wrote:
>
> If we're going to do that I vote no ASN.1, and no X.509. Just BNF
> format
> like the base SSL protocol; encrypt and then MAC only, no
> non-forward secret
> ciphersuites, no baked in key length limits. I think I'd also vote
> for a
> lot less modes and ciphers. And probably non-NIST curves while
> we're at it.
>
>
> Sounds like you want CurveCP?
>
> http://curvecp.org/
Yes, EXACTLY that. Proposals like CurveCP.
iang
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
