[147354] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] encoding formats should not be committee'ized
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Atwood)
Mon Sep 30 18:34:35 2013
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <52493936.8060704@iang.org>
From: Mark Atwood <me@mark.atwood.name>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 09:41:47 -0700
To: ianG <iang@iang.org>
Cc: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
> Why can't we just designate some big player to do it, and follow suit? Why
> argue in committee?
Well, there are Protobufs, and there is Thrift, and there is
MessagePack, and there is Avro...
http://www.igvita.com/2011/08/01/protocol-buffers-avro-thrift-messagepack/
..m
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
