[147353] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] TLS2
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (dan@geer.org)
Mon Sep 30 18:33:54 2013
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
From: dan@geer.org
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:49:49 +0300."
<52493B2D.3020200@iang.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:28:37 -0400
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
> Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> Why not do the requirements, then ask for competing proposals?
> Choose 1. It worked for NIST and committees didn't work for anyone.
Absolutely.
If there is anything I've learned about "the Internet" it is that
if you ask a difficult question you will get very little in the
way of answers you can trust a priori. However, if you make a false
claim, then people will come out of the woodwork to tell you that
"You are a doofus and here is why." Ergo, the way to ask a question
is to make a false claim the summed corrections to which contain the
answer to the question you wanted to ask.
We now return you to your program already in progress,
--dan
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
