[147379] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] NIST about to weaken SHA3?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James A. Donald)
Tue Oct 1 10:39:32 2013
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 11:07:00 +1000
From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <CACsn0ckV19uKprwo2iuOOS=7dm6EzBXxshoTKTH2QZyZiVVtAA@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: jamesd@echeque.com
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===============7798700529463344190==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------050607020205040801000209"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------050607020205040801000209
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 2013-10-01 08:51, Watson Ladd wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 2:21 PM, James A. Donald <jamesd@echeque.com
> <mailto:jamesd@echeque.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Weaker in ways that the NSA has examined, and the people that
> chose the winning design have not.
>
> This isn't true: Keccak's designers proposed a wide range of capacity
> parameters for different environments.
This is not Keccak's design.
This a new unexamined design somewhat resembling Keccak's design.
Or perhaps Keccak's design somewhat resembled what the NSA had already
decided to do.
--------------050607020205040801000209
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2013-10-01 08:51, Watson Ladd wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CACsn0ckV19uKprwo2iuOOS=7dm6EzBXxshoTKTH2QZyZiVVtAA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 2:21 PM, James A. Donald <span
dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:jamesd@echeque.com" target="_blank">jamesd@echeque.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"><br>
Weaker in ways that the NSA has examined, and the people
that chose the winning design have not.<br>
</blockquote>
<div>This isn't true: Keccak's designers proposed a wide
range of capacity parameters for different environments. <br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
This is not Keccak's design.<br>
<br>
This a new unexamined design somewhat resembling Keccak's design.<br>
<br>
Or perhaps Keccak's design somewhat resembled what the NSA had
already decided to do.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------050607020205040801000209--
--===============7798700529463344190==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
--===============7798700529463344190==--
