[14831] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Problems with GPG El Gamal signing keys?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ralf Senderek)
Fri Nov 28 14:51:20 2003
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 20:23:36 +0100 (CET)
From: Ralf Senderek <ralf@senderek.de>
To: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>,
cryptography <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
In-Reply-To: <878ym29qvz.fsf@alberti.g10code.de>
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Werner Koch wrote:
> Yes, yes, I should have removed ElGamal signing key support back in
> 1998 when there was no more need for it. I recall that some folks
> begged me not to do that and I took the wrong decision.
I think no-one will blame you for this, you couldn't have known the
effects. But what are we going to learn? Heading for far less complexity
is the future!
Regards
Ralf Senderek
*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*
* Ralf Senderek <ralf@senderek.de> http://senderek.de * What is privacy *
* Sandstr. 60 D-41849 Wassenberg +49 2432-3960 * without *
* PGP: AB 2C 85 AB DB D3 10 E7 CD A4 F8 AC 52 FC A9 ED * Pure Crypto? *
49466008763407508762442876812634724277805553224967086648493733366295231438448
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
