[149126] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] Conferences, committees, compliance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James A. Donald)
Mon Jan 20 11:14:51 2014
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 00:37:13 +1000
From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: Arnold Reinhold <agr@me.com>
In-Reply-To: <71692C48-9D2C-4A62-BB69-A8C962F1FD94@me.com>
Cc: "cryptography@metzdowd.com" <cryptography@metzdowd.com>,
ianG <iang@iang.org>
Reply-To: jamesd@echeque.com
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
"James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com> wrote:
>> Your argument amounts to saying that only NSA approved software is
>> going to get broad acceptance. I think more likely the other way
>> around.
On 2014-01-20 21:23, Arnold Reinhold wrote:
> You may be right, but perhaps others see things differently.
> Shouldn't they be encouraged to try?
If playing ball with RSA and EITF, probably planning to sell out
customers and users to NSA.
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
