[149185] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] Fwd: [IP] RSA Response to Media Claims Regarding
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Frantz)
Tue Jan 21 17:43:38 2014
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 14:27:50 -0800
From: Bill Frantz <frantz@pwpconsult.com>
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <52DE0989.8070806@echeque.com>
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
On 1/21/14 at 9:45 PM, jamesd@echeque.com (James A. Donald) wrote:
>On 2014-01-21 03:34, John Kelsey wrote:
>>However, I am pretty damned skeptical about how many US companies
>>will manage to resist a decade-long multi-million-dollar
>>intelligence operation run against them by their own government.
>
>Probably none, in which case we should rely on Chinese companies.
Well, it depends on your threat model. If you are a US company
concerned about the Chinese stealing your IP, vulnerability to
NSA is a better bet.
Cheers - Bill
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz | The first thing you need when | Periwinkle
(408)356-8506 | using a perimeter defense is a | 16345
Englewood Ave
www.pwpconsult.com | perimeter. | Los Gatos,
CA 95032
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
