[149204] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] Fwd: [IP] RSA Response to Media Claims Regarding
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kent Borg)
Wed Jan 22 12:46:48 2014
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:07:08 -0500
From: Kent Borg <kentborg@borg.org>
To: Bill Frantz <frantz@pwpconsult.com>, cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <r422Ps-1075i-0E08E5BFA7D8455CB1C0528ED914499C@Williams-MacBook-Pro.local>
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
On 01/21/2014 05:27 PM, Bill Frantz wrote:
> Well, it depends on your threat model. If you are a US company
> concerned about the Chinese stealing your IP, vulnerability to NSA is
> a better bet.
When the NSA breaks into a machine over the internet they probably use a
series of hops, but for the last hop in, what kind of IP address do you
suppose they choose? Possibly a Chinese IP address?
-kb
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
