[15038] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Non-repudiation (was RE: The PAIN mnemonic)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Anne & Lynn Wheeler)
Sat Dec 27 00:32:38 2003
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 14:43:08 -0700
To: Amir Herzberg <amir@herzberg.name>
From: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com>
Cc: <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.0.20031223111429.02562878@getmail.amir.herzberg.n
ame>
At 11:18 AM 12/23/2003 +0200, Amir Herzberg wrote:
>Any alternative definition or concept to cover what protocol designers
>usually refer to as non-repudiation specifications? For example
>non-repudiation of origin, i.e. the ability of recipient to convince a
>third party that a message was sent (to him) by a particular sender (at
>certain time)?
there is some reference in old posting in pkix thread:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/aadsm11.htm#14 Meaning of Non-repudation
possibly more than you want to know ... but merged security taxonomy and
glossary ... sources at:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/index.html#glosnote
has definitions for:
non-repudiation
non-repudiation exchange
non-repudiation information
non-repudiation of creation
non-repudiation of delivery
non-repudiation of knowledge
non-repudiation of origin
non-repudiation of receipt
non-repudiation of sending
non-repudiation of submission
non-repudiation of transport
non-repudiation policy
non-repudiation service
non-repudiation token
plus:
NRD token
NRO token
NRS token
NRT token
--
Anne & Lynn Wheeler http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/
Internet trivia 20th anv http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietff.htm
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
