[2396] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Strong encryption jeopardizes Israel?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Declan McCullagh)
Mon Mar 30 15:51:55 1998
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 12:39:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: cryptography@c2.net
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 12:38:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: politech@vorlon.mit.edu
Subject: Strong encryption jeopardizes Israel's security?
******
http://cgi.pathfinder.com/netly/afternoon/0,1012,1861,00.html
The Netly News / Afternoon Line
March 30, 1998
Legionnaires' Disease
Earlier this month American businesses proudly unveiled a encryption
lobbying campaign with new allies such as tire manufacturers and the
arch-conservative Eagle Forum. Now their fiercest opponent in the
House of Representatives has shown that he, too, can get a little help
from his friends. Rep. Gerald Solomon (R-N.Y.) last week informed
members of Congress that 4 million members of the American Legion
support mandatory backdoors in encryption products. Another Solomon
letter headlined "The SAFE Act jeopardizes Israel's security!!!"
claims relaxing U.S. restrictions on overseas exports of encryption
software makes Israel vulnerable to terrorists. It says top Israeli
defense advisor David Ivry urges "all of our friends in the United
States to oppose" the so-called SAFE crypto bill. Not a good idea,
says one tech-savvy rabbi. "I firmly believe that opposing this bill
is narrow-minded at least," Rabbi Haim Cassorla of the International
Conference Of Rabbis told The Netly News. "Blocking American
participation in the global security market would seriously hamper
American participation in this burgeoning field." Solomon heads the
House Rules Committee, which must choose between sending a
pro-industry or pro-law enforcement version of SAFE to the House floor
for a vote. --By Declan McCullagh/Washington
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 14:11:30 EST
From: RabbiLapin <RabbiLapin@aol.com>
To: declan@well.com
Dear Declan,
It seems to me that American interests not Israel's security should be the
chief concern of an American congressman. If I am wrong then perhaps Rep
Solomon would like to propose the medal of honor for Jonathan Pollard.
So even were it true that it would harm Israel's security, why is that
relevant? Am I missing something or is nobody willing to say this?
Furthermore, who can really tell what threatens Israel's security? Are we
ourselves so outstanding at knowing what threatens American security?
Administration leaks, genderizing the military, and countless other assaults
on our own long term national interest seem to go unchallenged. Why should
this one matter so much?
Finally, in exactly the same way that an informal bond, a kind of
philosophical alliance exists between PM Netanyahu and the Republican
leadership, exactly the same exists on the other side of the political divide.
There are those in the Israeli government just as in ours, to whom issues of
government control and centralized power are more important than abstracts of
national security. Their dislike for the free market and the independence
from government that it confers, trumps their concern for almost anything
else.
So what is new? Israeli socialists collaborate with American liberals to
further restrict the ability of citizens to trade with whom they choose. I
think our response should be something along the lines of "when Israel finally
succeeds in persuading American legislators to do to American business what
they have taken 50 years to inflict on the native entrepreneurial skills of 3
million Jews, to whom will they turn for foreign aid?"
Always remember that 80% of American Jews care more about keeping America
secular and liberal than they do about Israeli security. That is why they will
never support a strong American leader who is either strongly Christian,
strongly conservative (or both) regardless of how much he does for Israel.
Good luck;
RDL