[10035] in APO-L
Re: Something to be considered in 1996
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven R. Crawford)
Sun Nov 6 17:00:42 1994
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 1994 16:57:44 -0500
Reply-To: "Steven R. Crawford" <crawf_s@CS.ODU.EDU>
From: "Steven R. Crawford" <crawf_s@CS.ODU.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list APO-L <APO-L%PURCCVM.BITNET@mitvma.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <01HJ5XFUEVZM8ZE6VY@TOE.TOWSON.EDU>
My main point is that if something does not pass at two conventions in a
row, then it should "cool off" for a convention. If it is brought up
again, after the cool off period, then the old arguments would not be
brought up as prevently due to the fact that most brothers graduate
within a five year time period. It would get a fresh start when
reconsidered without the ghosts of the last convention.
BTW, I do read this list in digest mode. If you must really have an
immediate response then mail me a cc. If you do not cc me a copy, then
you will have to wait a day. If you send me a copy seperate from the one
you post, I will assume that what you are saying is private and will
weigh my option to respond, in other words you may not get a response to
your comment. Has anyone figured out my other point yet?
******************************************************************************
* Steven R. Crawford * Internet : crawf_s@cs.odu.edu *
* "The Highlander" * URL: http://www.odu.edu:70/gnusers/src/home.html *
******************************************************************************
* Chapter Brother #48 * Alpha Beta Omega Chapter * Alpha Phi Omega *
******************************************************************************
