[13102] in APO-L
Re: Voting on Pledges...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Liston Bias)
Fri Oct 27 15:44:37 1995
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 1995 14:25:58 -0500
Reply-To: bias@OSUUNX.UCC.OKSTATE.EDU
From: Liston Bias <bias@OSUUNX.UCC.OKSTATE.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list APO-L <APO-L@VM.CC.PURDUE.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <199510271702.MAA53032@email.okstate.edu>
On Fri, 27 Oct 1995, Kirk J. Brady wrote:
>
> Maybe it's just me, but what the heck is the point in having ANY
> requirements if you plan on voting people in anyway? Isn't that kinda
> defeating the purpose of setting the standards in the first place?
FYI: at Oklahoma State University we have two sets of requirements:
1) guarantees invitation to brotherhood
2) subset of 1) - give pledge the opportunity to go to FPR. This is who
we vote on. There are things we do not compromise in list 2 such as
fraternity history knowledge. For the most part, list 2 is meeting 75%
of requirements from list 1.
Thanks for bringing that up...
============================================================================
-- Liston Bias The mark of a true professional
Oklahoma State University is giving more than you get.
Alumni of Florida State Univ
bias@osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu
http://www.vsl.ist.ucf.edu/~hillis/liston.html
============================================================================
