[9582] in APO-L
Re: Gamma Sig vs APO
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (shad cook)
Mon Oct 3 12:27:29 1994
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 1994 11:24:30 -0500
Reply-To: shad cook <scook@d.umn.edu>
From: shad cook <scook@d.umn.edu>
To: Multiple recipients of list APO-L <APO-L%PURCCVM.BITNET@mitvma.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <9410030345.AA18908@mail1.sas.upenn.edu>
Riz,
I never said our (APO as a whole) should depend on the WEAKNESS of
another organization. I said that is so in OUR case. Yes there are
other service groups at UMD such as SERVE and MPIRG that don't deal with
such as wide range of activites as GSS and APO. We love the sisters of
GSS and don't want something to change that shouldn't have to. Next time
No Riz, the other coed service organizations such as SERVE and MPIRG
didn't destroy GSS. There was no need for the heat of that question
either. Some of us in APO and GSS are members of SERVE. We believe it
is a valid reason for not going coed. You're not here and haven't heard
the things that have been said, so don't pass the judgment that its a
lame excuse. I never implied GSS nationwide was either weak or going to
be affected by APO. I just said the chapter here at UMD. That your
opinion about the validity of the argument. Again like I said, between
the chapter of APO and GSS at UMD it is a very valid argument. You're
not here, so all i can say is that I find no validity in your argument
either.
Shad
