[9583] in APO-L
Re: your mail
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (shad cook)
Mon Oct 3 12:37:14 1994
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 1994 11:32:55 -0500
Reply-To: shad cook <scook@D.UMN.EDU>
From: shad cook <scook@D.UMN.EDU>
To: Multiple recipients of list APO-L <APO-L%PURCCVM.BITNET@mitvma.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <199410031450.JAA08528@ub.d.umn.edu>
On Mon, 3 Oct 1994, Undetermined origin c/o Postmaster wrote>
> To add to the APO vs. GSS discussion:
>
> I cannot say whether or not there are any internal weaknesses within the
> Gamma Sig system, but I do think that APO is much better known than they
> are. For that reason (at least here at Ship), many females come to us
> (since there are co-ed chapters) and we refer them to Gamma Sig. I'm not
> saying that they do not get pledges by themselves, they do. I am saying
> that in my opinion, I think that APO better known and for the typical
> freshman they are going the go to the group they have heard of and if our
> chapter was co-ed, I suspect they would come to us. That would lead to a
> decrease in the membership of GSS.
>
> This is just my theory and opinion.....
>
> Mike
>
***I agree Mike,
Shad
