[147359] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] TLS2
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James A. Donald)
Mon Sep 30 18:38:08 2013
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 07:27:50 +1000
From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <20130930080208.GA8242@netbook.cypherspace.org>
Reply-To: jamesd@echeque.com
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
On 2013-09-30 18:02, Adam Back wrote:
> If we're going to do that I vote no ASN.1, and no X.509. Just BNF format
> like the base SSL protocol;
Granted that ASN.1 is incomprehensible and horrid, but, since there is
an ASN.1 compiler that generates C code we should not need to comprehend it.
> base on PGP so you get web of trust,
PGP web of trust does not scale.
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
