[149123] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [Cryptography] Conferences, committees, compliance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (James A. Donald)
Mon Jan 20 11:11:29 2014
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:54:47 +1000
From: "James A. Donald" <jamesd@echeque.com>
To: Arnold Reinhold <agr@me.com>, ianG <iang@iang.org>
In-Reply-To: <06542B12-B794-4368-94C8-0DD6FD97D807@me.com>
Cc: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Reply-To: jamesd@echeque.com
Errors-To: cryptography-bounces+crypto.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@metzdowd.com
On 2014-01-20 08:47, Arnold Reinhold wrote:
> If new cryptography is going to have any chance roll back the mass
> surveillance state, it will have to make its way into commercial
> use.
IETF committees are owned by the surveillance state. Have to be
bypassed.
Your argument amounts to saying that only NSA approved software is
going to get broad acceptance. I think more likely the other way
around.
_______________________________________________
The cryptography mailing list
cryptography@metzdowd.com
http://www.metzdowd.com/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
